Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: >>>> (after a bit of testing)! I think we have accumulated more than >>>> enough additions, fixes, and new features to think about that. >>> >>> Regarding testing. I think `LaTeX-command-run-all-section' should >>> check if it's on a LaTeX document, for example in a plain tex document >> >> Fixed, and also for LaTeX-command-section. > > May I ask you why in `TeX-command-sequence' you funcall > `TeX-command-sequence-file-function' with `nondirectory' argument set > to t (line 645 of tex-buf.el)?
I noticed that `TeX-command-run-all' sometimes didn't "run all" but jumped straight to the View step when applied to the current section or region although I had edited the text in there. `TeX-command-region' did not have that problem and correctly suggested to run LaTeX. Well, and the only difference between `TeX-command-region' and `TeX-command-run-all' was that the former used the NONDIRECTORY argument for computing the file name to give to `TeX-command-default', and doing the same in `TeX-command-sequencethat' "fixed" the issue. > This breaks `TeX-command-sequence' run from included files placed in > directories different from `TeX-master-directory'!! Ups, I'm sorry! Well, then I should investigate why `TeX-command-default' guesses a different (wrong) command when the region is given with a path... Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
