Harald von Aschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 12:36 17.09.05 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >>Ralf Angeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > * Harald von Aschen (2005-09-16) writes: >> > >> >> Here are two more cases in which it is only possible to force to use the >> >> dollar sign $ in an embedded math environment by C-q $: >> >> This are: >> >> \framebox >> >> \minipage >> > >> > Thanks, I changed texmathp.el accordingly in CVS. >> >>I actually don't want to know just what a minipage or framebox should >>be doing in math made... > > Please see for example Gilbarg/Trudinger "Elliptic Partial > Differential Equations" or Cioranescu/Saint Jean Paulin > "Homogenization of Reticulated Structures", pg. 13, both Springer, > where assumptions are enumerated and then given an equation > number.
A parbox should be sufficient for that. A minipage is something that can also have footnotes. > Some people are even nesting equation numbers and there have been > problems with this nested structures with AMS but they are fixed, > see > http://www.tug.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/required/amslatex/math/diffs-m.txt > (and look there for minipage). > > Instead of a framebox I can certainly use a fbox but not under all > circumstances. (Yes, boxed equations look horrible, sorry for that but > I've used it for a presentation.) Why don't you use \boxed? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
