Uwe Siart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Can you come up with a single _actual_ example where the current >> behavior causes a problem? I mean, a given text file and a sequence >> of keystrokes that does not lead to the desired result? > > Suppose you want to compose > > " cell 1 & " > " cell 2 & " > " cell 3 & " > " cell 4 & " > > to be yanked in tables. The blanks after '&' are desired, for formatting > reasons. But when you try to type this line-by-line, each RET removes > the blank. > > But you're right. It would be sufficient to use just > > " cell 1 &" > " cell 2 &" > " cell 3 &" > " cell 4 & " > > and the result would be the same. I'll proceed like that.
On an unrelated note: you know M-x align-current RET ? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
