Hi,

consider the following minimal `.dtx' example:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
%    \begin{macrocode}
\newcommand{\blah}{%
  \textbf{%
    blah%
  }%
}
\newcommand*{\bleh}{%
  \ifthenelse{\isnamedefined{@foo}}{%
    \begin{tabular}{l}
      }{%
      \begin{tabular}{r}
        }%
        bleh
      \end{tabular}
      }
      \newcommand{\blih}[1]{%
      \textbf{%
      blih%
      }%
      }
%    \end{macrocode}
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The content of the \blah macro can be indented as usually with the TAB
key.

But, I guess because of the disruptive two \begin{tabular} for only one
\end{tabular}, the content of the \blih macro cannot be properly
indented.

IIRC, indentation used to work properly in both cases.

Do you know what's going on?

Best,
-- 
Denis


_______________________________________________
auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex

Reply via email to