Le 19/06/16 à 18h18, Denis Bitouzé a écrit :
> consider the following minimal `.dtx' example:
>
> [...]
>
> The content of the \blah macro can be indented as usually with the TAB
> key.
>
> But, I guess because of the disruptive two \begin{tabular} for only
> one \end{tabular}, the content of the \blih macro cannot be properly
> indented.
This happens with a plain `.tex' file as well:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{xifthen}
\begin{document}
\newcommand{\blah}{%
\textbf{%
blah%
}%
}
\newcommand*{\bleh}{%
\ifthenelse{\isnamedefined{@foo}}{%
\begin{tabular}{l}
}{%
\begin{tabular}{r}
}%
bleh
\end{tabular}
}
\newcommand{\blih}[1]{%
\textbf{%
blih%
}%
}
\end{document}
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
--
Denis
_______________________________________________
auctex mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
