cliveb wrote: > Well, now I'm confused. On this forum, and in the pinkfishmedia thread > Andrew has referenced, the Behringer gets the thumbs-up. Meanwhile the > pros over at rec.audio.pro, who I trust to know what they're talking > about, have soundly poo-poo'd the idea that it's possible to fix an > acoustic (room) problem with EQ, no matter how sophisticated.
You can't fix it with any EQ. You have to fix the room. That takes things like Ethan Winers Real Traps, which flat out work, but flunk the WAF completely. Using a EQ, or better a DSP, can make it better at one spot. And doing that may make you happy. The whole point is to be happy. BTW, Behringer is a low-end "pro" product line. It is decent and low priced. Higher end stuff costs as much as four times what the Behringer equivalent goes for. Most audio pros do not like Behringer stuff at all, as it won't stand up to the rigors of gigs, traveling, roadies, etc. -- Pat http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
