pfarrell Wrote: > P Floding wrote: > > I believe the article talks about some, at the time, typical > > implementation. > > And the time of discussion is clear from the byline: > Jitter & the Digital Interface > Rémy Fourré, October, 1993 > > So while the article is interesting, it is ancient. > Nearly 13 years is forever in digital signal processing times. > Even if you round the numbers against it, calling it 12 years > and say that Moore's law is 2 year cycles, you should expect > 2^6 = 64 times "better" in 12 years. > > If you can't have references within the past four or so years, > its meaningless, IMHO. > > I'm not convinced that jitter is an issue this century. > > -- > Pat > http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html
Well, Moore's "law" isn't a law as such. It only applies roughly, for the moment, in certain fields with explosive development. I don't know if digital audio is really such a field? But I agree that it would be more useful to look at today's stuff. The links opaqueice gave certainly point to things having moved on a lot. -- P Floding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=24613 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
