pfarrell Wrote: > mauidan wrote: > > PhilNYC Wrote: > >>Because the jitter performance of the Transporter's digital outs is > >>measured to be much better than that of the SqueezeBox, and he's > >>clearly looking for better performance. Or even further, if the > TacT > >>has a word clock out, he'd get even better performance using the > >>Transporter's word-clock input... > > > > > > $2K is a lot of money to pay to get better jitter performance. > > Especially since the jitter problem is just fiction to make > people spend money. > > I can believe it was a real problem decades ago. I see nothing > to indicate that any recent audiophile equipment has any audible > differences any more. > > IMHO, YMMV, etc. > > > -- > Pat > http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html
Decades ago? Why don't all transports sound the same then? Or was it just a flamestarter? -- P Floding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26332 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
