highdudgeon Wrote: 
> So, I've been following the discussions, reading and investigating the
> specs, thinking about what I know and think about Slim Devices and how
> I rate their competence and honesty, etc., etc., etc., and, naturally,
> I have to think to myself: what about the cottage industry of
> modifiers?
> 
> After all, for more or less -- I suppose slightly more -- than the
> price of a SB3 with an external PS, a new DAC (internal or external),
> etc., you can get a beautiful and versatile device built to beyond NASA
> standards.  What could be lacking?!
> 
> Then, on the drive home from work, it hit me: tubes! Somebody will
> something euphonic, with greater SNR, etc., and I bet someone comes up
> with a tube buffer or output stage, etc.
> 
> Of course, tubes don't seem very popular in this forum, but, hey.
> 
> PS, I am being facetious and just kidding around.  Please, no flames or
> personal assaults, okay?  NO OFFENSE INTENDED TO ANYONE.
> 
> Besides, it really is a half-serious question: I mean, how would you
> improve on this thing?


George-

If Slim Devices would post the Transport's circuit diagram, 
parts list and pictures of it's insides, I'm sure there are many people
on this forum that could see "What could be lacking?"
and make recommendations to mod/upgrade it's performance. 

Since you've owned lots of high end equipment, I'm sure you know, there
are lots of fancy looking boxes with very cheap parts on the inside.


-- 
mauidan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
mauidan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1679
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26453

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to