Pat Farrell;131153 Wrote: 
> reeve_mike wrote:
> > What I was trying to contribute was that the samples on the CD do
> not
> > faithfully represent the musical waveform,
> > they only represent a version of it filtered at 20.5KHz, which
> seemed
> > to be relevant at the time but now I can't remember why ...
> 
> I would not expect it to be 20.5kHz.
> The sample rate is 44.1, so in theory, you could have signals as
> high as 22.05kHz.
> 

Surely I can be forgiven a typo ...  :-)

Pat Farrell;131153 Wrote: 
> 
> Realistically, there is nearly nothing above 20kHz to start.
> Not only is 20-20kHz the standard "spec" but most microphones
> have serious roll off above 17kHz or so. And all of the preamps
> used for the microphones, especially the 'vintage' ones that people 
> swear sound best. Neve, SSL, etc.
> 
> And analog signals don't stop at clean numbers like 20.5, they just
> roll 
> off at X dB per octave.
> 

Agreed in general, but I've used some nice vintage Neumann mics that go
way up high ...

The fact that they don't stop dead but roll off was an implicit part of
my point, the ultrasonics are there, even if they are increasingly
down,
and we don't yet fully understand their effects - I think that we are
in serious agreement here!

Pat Farrell;131153 Wrote: 
> 
> One of the better speakers of the era was the Quad 63
> 

As an aside, I would claim that it is still a good speaker in this era
...

[BTW I am biased because the pair that I bought back in 1984 still
serve me well in a secondary system ...  :-)]

Pat Farrell;131153 Wrote: 
> 
> All in all, I think that 44.1/16 was a good engineering choice at the 
> time.
I think that it was a good (and at the time the only available) product
engineering choice
but I don't think that it was a good sound/music engineering choice ...
:-O

Mike


-- 
reeve_mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------
reeve_mike's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=995
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26685

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to