Hiroyuki Hamada;136650 Wrote: > I would also look into the digital only version. > > Hiroyuki > > On Sep 15, 2006, at 11:37 PM, krochat wrote: > > > > > highdudgeon;136641 Wrote: > >> I think that would be callled a Squeeze Box. Used that into your > DAC > >> and you're done. > > > > Well, not quite - the Transporter supports higher resolution files > > (96/24) than the Squeezebox (48/24), and also has AES/EBU digital > > outputs. I, for one, would be very interested in a > digital-output-only > > Transporter for (say) $795. > > > > > > -- > > krochat > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > > krochat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php? > > userid=6579 > > View this thread: > http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=27458 > > > >
Likewise. I have significant money invested in my DAC, I like it and don't want to replace it. Also, could care less about the knobs and buttons on the front of the unit - I'm way too lazy to get up and fidget with them. Basically, what I want is a SB to the nth degree of audiophility. Better chassis, and whatever they did to make the digital output of the Transporter "better" than the SB. Price-point-wise I would have liked the option of something between the SB and the Transporter. Figgered since others were comfortable driving from the backseat I'd throw in my order as well.... -- joncourage ------------------------------------------------------------------------ joncourage's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2837 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=27458 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
