mauidan;136771 Wrote: > "As for word clock, imagine an all digital TACT based system like the > one I use in my 5.1 setup. You can clock the amps directly to the same > clock as the Transporter. With the development of other Class D amps > that accept digital inputs, the benefit of having word synch is fairly > clear, especially when you are using bi-amping or tri-amping with those > digital amps as I am." > > Since you're running the digital signal through a TacT TCS or 2.2XP > which don't have word clock inputs, having the Transporter and amps > connected to the same word clock will produce very little if any > improvement. You'll need to have word clock inputs installed on your > TCS & 2.2XP and sync the whole thing to an iClock or something like it > to get the full benefit.
This isn't in the 2.2. system. This is in the 5.1 system where I use BOZ 216/2200s (where each amp has word synch input) to bi-amp and externally crossover each of my Eggleston Andra IIS. -- Sleestack *headphone:* singlepower sds-xlr at, classe sacd2, hd650 *2 channel:* tact rcs 2.2.xp w/ full aberdeen mods, bel canto oneref. 1000 monoblocks x 4,teac esoteric p-03/d-03, epiphany 12-12s (waiting for my 20-21s), tact w210 corner load subs *5.1 channel:* tact tcs mkii w/ aberdeen power supply, tact boz 216/2200 (x5) w/ aberdeen power supply, tact adc6 w/ full aberdeen mods, denon 5910, bel canto pl-1a, eggleston andra ii (x5), velodyne dd-15, pioneer elite pro 1130hd ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sleestack's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6598 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=27458 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
