seanadams;136660 Wrote: > That's basically it, with the further point I just thought of: adding > passive attenuation would be a bad idea unless the source Z in low. > Really it looks like 100Ω is the way to go - since nobody's > rooting for 1K, I'm going to change it. Sean, I want to applaud how receptive Slim Devices have been over this issue. I certainly think you're making the right decision.
Someone else earlier asked how many audiophiles are likely to want to run a Transporter directly into power amps some distance away. Well, here's one: my plan would be to connect the Transporter balanced outputs to the balanced inputs of my ATC active speakers. Not that I've ordered a Transporter yet - so my vote probably doesn't carry so much weight. But I think Transporter direct into ATCs (or similar atcive speakers) is a superb minimalist concept, and many potential customers might be tempted by it. Edit: forgot to mention that the input impedance of the ATC power amps is only 10k, so they will certainly benefit from the reduced output impedance. -- cliveb Performers -> dozens of mixers and effects -> clipped/hypercompressed mastering -> you think a few extra ps of jitter matters? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=27445 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
