Coffee;153234 Wrote: > If the DAC is designed properly, it should use its own clock to resample > the input. In that case the SB3 would be a perfect (as in cannot be > better) source. Why would a Transporter be better in that case? Better > buttons?
To answer this question - as far as I can tell there are a grand total of three manufacturers of "properly designed DACs" - Lavry, Benchmark, and the higher-end Dodsons. I'm pretty sure that there are lots of folks who own DACs that aren't "properly designed" - I'm one of them. To add another reason to my previous post - I have lots of 96x24 recording that would be downsampled to 48kHz on the SB3 that would play at 96kHz on the Transporter. Regards, Kim -- krochat ------ SB3 (+linear) -> Big Ben -> TacT RCS 2.2X -> 2xS2150 -> Vandersteen 3a Signature + TacT W210 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ krochat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6579 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29494 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
