totoro;169805 Wrote: 
> That seems like a pretty "objectivist" position to me :). The idea that
> all objectivists think that if you can't measure it you can't hear it
> is a canard.
> 
> The position I, and I think others, take is: if you can't measure it,
> you better be able to show that it can be distinguished in blind tests,
> in order to make sure it's doing _something_.
> 
> So I guess I agree with you.....

Depends on what you want to do with the information (or "opinon"). If I
think my hifi sounds better after a change, that is good enough for me.
Sometimes you have to be able to trust your ears to get anywhere in
this hobby (and even professionally, I might add).

I certainly don't intend to tell anyone "how it is", so I reserve the
right to express subjective opinions. (My personal non-proven "truths",
or beliefs, if you wish..)


-- 
P Floding
------------------------------------------------------------------------
P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=31533

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to