lafayette;169793 Wrote: 
> I, for one, don't get the need to whine on Internet forums.

Why not?

The OP clearly attempted to get BC to correct this oversight or blatant
cash grab, in complete privacy.  They failed to do so or even bother to
answer.

They were given the opportunity to correct the situation and chose not
to do so.

So now they deserve to either be publicly shamed or at least have the
community at large become aware of what they're up to.  An Internet
forum reaches a LOT of like-minded people (with disposable incomes, I
might add!)  Of all the avenues available to the OP, it is, by far, the
best medium to expose their practices to the greatest number of people. 
And what's more, it's finely targeted to the people who actually
purchase these products - a letter to the New York Times, say, would
actually reach less interested people who were not as inclined to
purchase BC products.

I used to associate Bel Canto with "a bunch of high-end audiophile
companies that I may be able to buy something from someday".  I now put
them in their own group - "a high-end audiophile company that I will
never buy anything from someday".

Ethics in marketing and business is severely lacking these days. 
There's an increasing feeling the consumer is growing sick and tired of
it and unethical practices are being exposed and publicly ridiculed. 
That is exactly as it should be.  These companies richly deserve it.


-- 
Mark Lanctot
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=31562

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to