tomjtx;176908 Wrote: > Recently on AC an OB got a 30 day time out. I re read a lot of his posts > and I dont think they merited a time out. > > OTOH some of the SUBs replies to the OB were rude and hostile but they > didn't get time outs. > One of the most egregious examples was when a moderator was very > insulting and rude to the OB on a thread the OB started to protest the > unfairness of the time out. Including calling the guy an A**hole! The > Mod later deleted that word but not the other rude charecterizations. > > It seems to me the time out was more a retaliation for the OB's views > than for the tone of is posts. > > I would hate to see this kind of "moderation" on this forum.
Exactly my feelings about audiocircle. It seems to me that some people would prefer that situation here. If the tweakers don't like arguing with the dbx'ers, they could of course say something like, "yes, I understand that this could all be placebo, but I choose to believe it's not", or simply not respond. Instead, they come out with (generally very shaky) reasons why the general methodology is wrong. If they choose to engage back, then why is it the fault of the skeptics? As one of the above posters said, it takes two to argue. It just seems that one side here is asking for privileged status. And I don't see any reason why they should get it. -- totoro squeezebox 3 -> mccormack dna .5 -> audio physic tempo 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ totoro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5935 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32352 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
