totoro;178295 Wrote: 
> There should be a special line in that page for people who make the
> following argument:
> 
> I think you are wrong: furthermore, I'm going to make an implicit claim
> that you are committing a fallacious argument of known type, as listed
> on this page, but I won't tell you which.
> 
> Aside from having no validity as an argument itself, the implicit
> "you're dishonest/stupid" component is fairly uncivil. 
> 
> So I'll reply in kind: the "argument" you just made can fairly
> charitably be called bullshit. And this is entirely independent of
> whatever the position you are opposing happens to be.

Well golly, I certainly don't understand why you've go your knickers in
such a twist. CeeJay was simply relaying a comment from someone at Slim
Devices, caveated it as such, and asked for comments. Given the care
with which he posted, I've have no issues with his post. The point I
was trying to make is that in both science and engineering, a plausable
and logical hypothosis is a far cry from a compelling and definitive
proof, especially when it never goes to the next step of empirical
verification.
And yes, this is covered in the referenced url, as is 'changing the
subject', 'moving the goalposts', 'ad hominem', 'appeal to authority',
etc... which is applicable to many of the posts on this board,
including my own. I think that url is a wonderful reference -
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html
as I often read posts, including my own, and have trouble giving name
to the particular error in logic/rhetoric. If you feel the reference is
of no use to you, ignore it.

As to the actual subject matter at hand -
I have the little Unifive +5v wall wart in front of me. Actually, it
also makes an equal caliber -5v supply with a switching of the
connector, as it is a floating supply. Its noise production is both
transverse and common. That common mode component is exacerbated by the
long, parallel, non shielded leads. Similarly, 6'+ of 21ga?? ground lead
is less than ideal. Nor is there, I assume, given its less than 2 cubic
inch volume, much room for the inductive components generally found
within far larger and more expensive switchers to deal with noise. And
ultimately, that ground is referenced to the signal ground on both the
RCA analog and digital outputs, which by a circuitous path ultimately
establish a ground reference.
All I can suggest is that folks might read Bill Whitlock's (at the
Jensen transformer site) papers on 'dirty grounds'.
FWIW


-- 
occam
------------------------------------------------------------------------
occam's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=949
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32231

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to