totoro;179092 Wrote: > > But seriously, the "if you did a (somewhat) controlled experiment and > your paticipant(s) didn't hear the results of (lambda x. tweak x), then > they must have cloth ears" is so tired as to be a cliche. Occam seemed > to make a point of _not_ resorting to that. I was merely applauding him > for that, while callng "bullshit" on PFloding and PhilNYC. >
As I've said before, I wish that people who want rigor applied to testing methodologies would also want rigor applied to understanding the characteristics of the test subjects. It's a pretty universally-accepted idea that individuals hear differently from one-another. I don't see how asking about someone's listening habits on a report of a blind test is "bullshit". And one more note about civility, I have yet to call anyone a "bullshitter"... -- PhilNYC Sonic Spirits Inc. http://www.sonicspirits.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PhilNYC's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=837 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32231 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
