hirsch;179800 Wrote: > In fact, if an objectively measurable difference was audible in an > unblinded test, and inaudible in a DBT, all it would prove at that > point is that DBT is a relatively less sensitive design.
With all due respect, I suggest that if people want to reduce the number of responses citing DBT, then they should refrain from making false statements. If you objectively measure a difference with test equipment, but you cannot identify the difference in a proper DBT (allowing for as many listens for as long a period as you like), then the DBT proves that you cannot identify a difference auditorily. That is exactly what a DBT can prove. -- jeffmeh ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jeffmeh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3986 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32352 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
