opaqueice;179870 Wrote: > I didn't start this conversation. Someone else came into this thread, > after it had finally died, and started making false statements about > BT. > > > > They obviously do have significance - they provide strong evidence that > the subject couldn't hear a difference under the test circumstances. > That's very useful information. And by the way, it's meaningless to > speak about negative versus positive results: there isn't really any > such distinction, either in formal logic or the practice of science. > > > > You're doing exactly the same.
Yes, but I want such a zone... Negative results: 1. We would like to prove that there exists red cars. 2. We observe cars. 3a. We see red car. We have proven that at least one red car exists. or 3b. We never see a red car. We didn't prove a single thing. This is what's called a "negative result". -- P Floding No, I didn't ABX it. And I won't even if you ask me. (Especially not if you ask me.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32352 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
