Eric Carroll;184347 Wrote: > Ya, the fibre is inferior by default discussion knocked me for a loop, > causing me to drop the all important HDCD investigation :-) > > I am at the same place as you. To summarize. > > Skunk highlighted a posting in headfi where with waveforms that looks > like it worked (but had some conversational chaff that initially > confused me). I got someone at hydrogenaudio to post a waveform that > looked like it worked. Olav posted in this forum that he did get a > successful result, but did not post his waveforms. > > Skunk and others identify that some HDCDs don't use the compression > component of HDCD. > > I have my waveform of Tublar Bells where I did not get any range > expansion. > > I can't remember if you posted your waveform, but you indicated you did > not see a successful decode. > > I upgraded to WMP10 and cleared my runtime issue and it didnt help, > although I DID get the HDCD icon lit. > > So, if Olav comes back, we should all pick the same HDCD and try it and > see if we get the same result, and triangulate on PC config as Skunk > suggested. > > I want to be able to do this too. Its annoying me that I cannot get > this to work.
OK Eric - I agree. It's really getting to me too. I wonder if there is ANY way we could get someone who knows about the MS technology to comment off the record of course... Let's pick a CD... (ideally one where we know that range expansion IS present - how do we prove that? ... I mean I know that the ones I mentioned earlier sound great on an HDCD player, but..) -- Phil Leigh ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32967 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
