pablolie;185812 Wrote: 
> Decoding straightforward algorithms is nothing for a modern CPU
> loadwise. This stuff is merely a matter of never starving the buffer of
> the unit that truly converts things into sound, i.e. analog.... 

You seem to be missing the point entirely - did you read the thread?  I
fully agree with you that there is almost certainly no such effect, but
some people regard as reasonable the possibility that the increased CPU
load due to processing FLAC could cause EMI which degrades the sound
quality, and as a possible reason to use WAV and/or explain perceived
differences in uncontrolled listening tests.  

I'm pointing out that we have no reason to think CPU load is actually
heavier for FLAC, or that any of that processing matters relative to
other CPU tasks such as generating the display.  My example of wireless
versus wired was to show that if we worry about CPU load, why not worry
about that as well? 

What about the phase of the moon?  After all, tidal forces at full and
new moons will pull more strongly on vertically oriented interconnects,
resulting in increased distortion.  The only solution I can see is an
anti-gravity device - I'm working on it! 

As for jitter, the SB design is clearly and demonstrably superior to
any S/PDIF implementation.  The data is buffered via much faster than
real-time asynchronous transmission which is essentially immune to bit
errors, and then played out with a local crystal oscillator.  This
equals the theoretical best possible jitter elimination performance of
an external DAC connected either via S/PDIF or wordclock (of course
there could still be differences in the analogue stage, power supply,
etc.).


-- 
opaqueice
------------------------------------------------------------------------
opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32999

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to