You're asking him to explain the subjective impressions of some biased reviewed? He's an engineer, not a psychologist.
Do they really use peak-peak results? Meaning the largest deviation from the ideal between two edges that occurs in some sample? If so that's an incredibly stupid way to characterize any distribution - it's what's called a non-robust statistic. It's like characterizing house prices in a neighborhood by the price of the most expensive house within some (unspecified) radius. Clearly the mean or median, or in the case of jitter the RMS variation from the ideal, is much more robust and useful. -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33276 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
