If you are ripping to individal tracks using EAC, and the FLAC
compression is proving to be the bottleneck, you might want to look at
the 'EAC options' -> 'Tools' tab.  There is an option to allow the
external compressor to start in the background, with a further option
to specify the number of simultaneous compressor threads.  Correct me
if I'm wrong, but I think this would allow the ripping to continue
without waiting for the compressor, and you could allow, say, 4
compressor threads to run in parallel.  Each one would be a quarter of
the speed of a single thread (because of the CPU dependence, and
ignoring any advantage you might get from multiple cores), but I think
the point is that EAC would not pause the ripping process unless all of
those threads were busy.  I'm not certain about this - please chip in if
anyone knows better.

I've been ripping CDs to FLAC images (not individual tracks) using EAC.
With this approach, FLAC starts up after the entire CD has been ripped.
I find the FLAC compression is usually finished in less time than it
takes me to create the EAC log file, eject the CD and put the next one
in - it is definitely quicker than the ripping process - at a guess I'd
say about 30 seconds to compress an entire image.  I'm using the latest
FLAC (1.1.4?) with the default compression option, and running on an
AM2 Athlon 64 4200+ dual core processor with Windows XP 32-bit - not a
particularly 'high end' setup.

Even in C2 secure mode, EAC rips most CDs in 2 to 3 minutes - the
ripping speed increases with the later tracks on a disc, and the last
few tracks are often ripped at close to 40x.  This is with a fairly
cheap LG DVD-RAM drive.


-- 
chill
------------------------------------------------------------------------
chill's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10839
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34156

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to