crooner wrote: > This also needs to be cost effective, because otherwise I would simply > shell out the 2 grand and buy the Transporter...
No, it does not need to be cost effective, this is the audiophiles list It is interesting to look at the progression of other hobbies. In the late 50s, if you wanted a high performance car, you built it. in the late 60s, you bought a GTO, Mustang, etc. then in the late 70s, smog rules sucked the life out of cars, and the home-built hot rods came back. Some parts of the car hobby just baffle me, sure the hotrod Hondas and other front wheel drive cars are fast, but a ten year old Mustang with just a little tweaking is just as fast for lots less money. So clearly some of it is just for the hell of doing something weird. -- Pat http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
