adamslim;215696 Wrote: > I hate agreeing with Opaqueice. Ok then I won't :)
Good. Agreement is boring :-). > > Sorry but I have not seen anything that proves that audiodiffmaker (or > any similar measurement-differencer system) is better than the human > ear. Hmm, good point. I wonder - do you also find it easier to discern differences with the volume on your amp turned all the way down? Or maybe you listen to your CDs by holding them very close to your ears? After all, the ear is a magical device that's far more accurate than any electronic gear, right? So why not remove the CD player and amp and speakers - they just get in the way. Look - audiodiffmaker is like turning up the volume on the differences and turning down everything else. Once it does that for you, you can USE YOUR EARS to listen to the difference file - and guess what, the differences are easier to hear, just like it's easier to hear louder sounds than softer (at least for normal human beings with non-magical ears), or to hear a quiet sound when there's no loud one to obscure it. And if you want proof it reveals differences that the ear can't hear, that's very easy. Just take two identical files and run one through a filter that distorts phase. Totally inaudible (except in extreme cases), but the difference file will reveal it easily. -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36503 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
