dudeymon;216395 Wrote: > You're right - there is no way of adding back accurate information. > It's always a guess. But, if I can make a pretty good guess - based on > a thorough analysis of the samples I do have before and after the gap, I > can potentially provide additional information that, while not accurate, > may be better than no additional information at all. At least, that's my > goal.
I see. Interesting. I agree that IF (and it is a big if) you could acurately calculate the interim values that would be a good thing. However, my experience is that the sampling frequency )above 44.1khz) is not really important to perceived quality - but the bit depth is. If you could interpolate intelligently from 16 bit to 24 bit that would be great - even at 44.1 -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... ...SB3+TACT+Altmann+MF DACXV3/Linn tri-amped Aktiv 5.1 system and some very expensive cables ;o) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36986 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
