325xi;221783 Wrote: > This is taken pretty much out of context, isn't it? Not as far as I am aware.
325xi;221783 Wrote: > I remember another research discussed here where the numbers were about > 0.5ns, and still, everything was done using artificial signal which > doesn't resemble music Benjamin and Gannon's research used both test signals AND real music. They discovered that the effects of jitter was more audible on test signals than it was on real music. 325xi;221783 Wrote: > Also interesting how subtle difference is registered - I'm afraid in > this kind of research the minimal level of audibility to register the > difference is much higher then if the same people were listening > relaxed with no goal in mind. Well, that's opening up the whole "blind testing is too stressful" can of worms again. I'd rather not get involved in that debate, which is unwinnable by either side. All I did was supply a reference in response to someone else asking for one. -- cliveb Transporter -> ATC SCM100A ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=37557 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
