325xi;221783 Wrote: > I remember another research discussed here where the numbers were about > 0.5ns, and still, everything was done using artificial signal which > doesn't resemble music Using artificial, or static signals isn't unusual in this type of test, and is probably preferred. It's often much easier to hear a difference in this type of situation, than it is when listening to a complex audio event, such as music.
325xi;221783 Wrote: > I'm afraid in this kind of research the minimal level of audibility to > register the difference is much higher then if the same people were > listening relaxed with no goal in mind. I've heard this argument before, and > I don't buy it. But in any event, you should never design gear to the limits of what someone may hear, you should always leave some margin. Cheers, Dave -- DCtoDaylight ------------------------------------------------------------------------ DCtoDaylight's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7284 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=37557 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
