Robin Bowes;228865 Wrote: > haunyack wrote: > > Richard Vandersteen's take on EQ/RC : > > [snip] > > I don't think he quite gets it. > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but RC (hint: Room Correction) as I > understand > it doesn't really touch the original signal, it simply takes away the > effect of the room. > > e.g. > > Standard system: > > Signal-->Speaker-->Room-->Ear > > Room can be thought of as a filter. e.g > > Signal-->Speaker-->Filter-->Ear > > So, if we want to remove the effect of the Filter(i.e. the room), we > need to apply the inverse of the Filter to the signal. e.g. > > Signal-->1/Filter-->Speaker-->Filter-->Ear > > If the filtering is done in the digital domain with sufficient > precision > and accuracy it should have little or effect on the signal. > > Of course, this is all theoretical. I've not actually played with RC > yet. > > R.
Exactly. The use of additive or subtractive convolving filters to emulate acoustic spaces, microphones etc is now well-established in Studio Land. Using this technology (which in essence is just a bunch of rather clever filters/transforms) clearly works. -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... ...SB3+TACT+Altmann+MF DACXV3/Linn tri-amped Aktiv 5.1 system and some very expensive cables ;o) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35615 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
