ezkcdude;229865 Wrote: > Of course, I presented some evidence above that only very large amounts > of jitter were audible to people, and you seemed to dismiss those > results.
Huh? Did I say that? Wasn't what I said we can't be sure it's the only cause for an audible difference? Also, didn't we agree on that already? ezkcdude;229865 Wrote: > Should we just take it on faith? How come you're excluding the possibilty (= that which directly follows from the quote you took from my reply), that you might hear the same difference because it's there? You make this sound as if you're not even taking this into consideration. In other words, if I vote for moderate scepticism and say that in case of doubt, one should perhaps trust one's ears (and satisfy oneself with finding the reason in good time), you're voting for a complete distrust of one's aural faculty? That can't be what you meant to say, right? So, what about taking that possibility into consideration, that you might indeed hear what I (and others) hear? Greetings from Switzerland, David. -- acousticsguru ------------------------------------------------------------------------ acousticsguru's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13298 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38637 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
