betto;230047 Wrote: > If you put the clock where it deserves to be -as near as possible to the > DAC- jitter becomes a no issue. Remeber: jitter is a transmission > issue. Backwards jitter goes up but that's non harmful because can't > corrupt the data, so sound quality is not affected. It's just as simple > as that. It don't cost more money, quite the contrary: "quality" of > transport don't matter anymore-as long as there is no loss of data, but > even a 30$ CD_Rom mech can do it.
Remember where I started from: why do we audiophiles who want an audio server to replace a CD-Transport, are attracted Slim Devices products because one doesn't need to be a dedicated PC hacker to use them, have to pay 1700 USD more to get a WC input (and, if needed, AES/EBU)? A Squeezebox with WC input would do just fine. Greetings from Switzerland, David. -- acousticsguru ------------------------------------------------------------------------ acousticsguru's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13298 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38637 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
