mortod;229964 Wrote: > For consistency, don't - what you see in REW is also ignores the mic > calibration (BTW I am using a bk3spline target [you asked earlier], but > the lack of mic calibration makes that irrelevant when viewing REW > responses as the RSSPL has such steep drop offs). > > Are you able to check the Impulse Response windowing in AL? It > certainly makes a difference to the shape of the low frequency curve if > you have those boundaries wrong. > > And I had better go do some more listening!
mortod, I asked about the target. This is odd to me, since I thought the bk-3-spline is supposed to result in a correction that gives a gradual dropoff as the frequency increases. Your curves looked pretty flat in comparison. I wonder why that is? Also, when importing the Impulse_Response into REQW, you wouldn't want to use it's internal mic cal file, would you? If DRC is generating these impulse files with its own mic calibration file accounted for, you'd want to see that direct information in REQW. If there was a way to even view it with REQW's own cal file you'd be doing double correction, wouldn't you? Or did I just say the same thing as you? :-) -- tonyptony ------------------------------------------------------------------------ tonyptony's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3397 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35615 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
