esbrewer;232504 Wrote: > But DRC is still not acting on the upward trend in the HF. Attached are > my new measurements (measured response, minimal, normal, insane). Any > suggestions as to why? >
I suggest reviewing the target curve file (PSPointsFile) and mic calibration file (MCPointsFile). Can you check which txt files are listed in your drc file, and post them... esbrewer;232504 Wrote: > A couple of you appear to be suggesting (and correct me if I'm wrong) > that the ecm8000 file is NOT being considered in the generation of the > test convolutions. Does that mean that DRC may be actually correcting > for the HF upkick in what I hear, but the test convolution responses > may not show it? > > If so, are the test convolutions really useful in assessing how DRC is > working? > Both of those traces are "as heard by the mic". They are both equally affected by any mic error, and are not "corrected" in any way. This is good, because we can compare the two traces to see the change made by drc. From 2.45kHz to 10kHz we see only a 3dB rise on the pink (some_TC) trace, compared to 8dB on the red (measured). The difference (5dB) is the amout of correction. If your look at a graph of your filter it should also show that 10kHz is 5dB down compared to 2.45kHz. So yes drc is doing some good. but I dont understand why it is not better. -- htrd Toby Dickenson ------------------------------------------------------------------------ htrd's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3710 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35615 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
