Curious as to whether the highly transparent system of firmware updates
and a good team making things better had gone the mile, I converted a
24/88 .wma  which does play in Transporter although the sample rate is
reported at 22.7 kHz,  to 24/88 .wav using the free Microsoft wmal2pcm
converter.  

Foobar, Winamp and WMP all play the file and show file properties as
24/88

Transporter will not play this file, producing loud hiss with a very
faint background of some music, too faint to be discernable.

So I still find all this quite odd.

At present it seems Transporter will play:

24/88 wma at a slimserver reported high bit rate BUT diminished sample
rate of 22.7 kHz.

24/88 flac at a slimserver reported high bit rate and 88.2 kHz sample
rate.

Transporter will NOT play 24/88 .wav files!

So I still question if Transporter is properly playing these 88.2 kHz
file formats.  Is it hit and miss?  Are these inconsistencies bugs?  Is
it being worked on?   Was Transporter never intended nor will it ever
support 88.2 kHz?

I’m a bit surprised the powers to be won’t step up to the plate and
give us the true skinny.

Also a bit surprised this thread has attracted only one responder. 
Perhaps no one cares about Hi-Res through the Transporter?

Perhaps John Atkinson is correct when he states Transporter will not
“handle” 24/88 Hi-Res files.  It’s certainly not handling them
consistently in my experience.


-- 
RGibran

RG
---------------------------------------------
Transporter > PS Audio GCC-100 > Martin Logan Aeon I
------------------------------------------------------------------------
RGibran's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10220
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=40315

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to