seanadams;243926 Wrote: > Transporter does not properly support 88.2. Currently if you are > hearing it play 88.2, it is because it is being decimated in software. > > The crystals were chosen to do 44.1, 96, and fractions thereof. Why not > put a crystal fast enough for 88.2 in there? Because when you are trying > to minimize jitter, EMI, noise etc, you use the slowest possible clock > rates, the least possible amount of clock dividing, etc. > > Since demand for 88.2 has now materialized, I will investigate if there > is a way to make it do it. It may be possible to do with the existing > crystals - certainly the rest of the system (eg the CPU) can handle it > since we're doing 96KHz.
Sean, Thank you very much. If Transporter could handle 24/88 without having to up or down sample that would be so sweeet. -- RGibran RG --------------------------------------------- Transporter > PS Audio GCC-100 > Martin Logan Aeon I ------------------------------------------------------------------------ RGibran's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10220 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=40315 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
