seanadams;255739 Wrote: > > Also, no amount of skill could convert Transporter's digital audio path > to 32-bit, unless you redesigned nearly the entire product from scratch. > I.e., it is utterly impossible to do it by soldering on some components, > regardless of skill level. I could not do it by swapping components, and > I have full source code to the entire system and know every proprietary > detail of the design. >
I think the idea is to use something like a CS8421 and up-sample it to 32 bits, then feed it into AKM 32 bit dacs. At a technical level I have a preference for Anagram upsampling technology but I have an open mind. seanadams;255739 Wrote: > > Besides the fact, what benefit would it have? > The ear is a rather funny thing. You really need to suck it and see to find out. Some guys, for example, claim they can hear jitter below 2ps. I find that hard to believe, but am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. My greatest concern about such claims is if those that claim it are willing to subject it to a blind listening test. I generally discount those that wimp out on doing it. Thanks Bill -- bhobba ------------------------------------------------------------------------ bhobba's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14889 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41756 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
