seanadams;243926 Wrote: > Transporter does not properly support 88.2. Currently if you are > hearing it play 88.2, it is because it is being decimated in software. > > The crystals were chosen to do 44.1, 96, and fractions thereof. Why not > put a crystal fast enough for 88.2 in there? Because when you are trying > to minimize jitter, EMI, noise etc, you use the slowest possible clock > rates, the least possible amount of clock dividing, etc. > > Since demand for 88.2 has now materialized, I will investigate if there > is a way to make it do it. It may be possible to do with the existing > crystals - certainly the rest of the system (eg the CPU) can handle it > since we're doing 96KHz.
Dear Sean, First, I want to say what a wonderful thing you have done for audiophiles and music lovers. I am a very happpy SB3 owner and I have really enjoyed the paradigm shift you have provided. However, I am also an audiophile and that means I am the princess atop the pea (so to speak), a gift horse mouth examiner and, generally, just an incredible ingrate ;). I am eyeing the Transporter lustfully, but I need to know that it will handle all of the likely hi-rez download formats before I can consider popping for it. Any updates or future products to deal with this issue? -- buelligan ------------------------------------------------------------------------ buelligan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9019 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=40315 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
