opaqueice;288377 Wrote: > If it's functioning as it's supposed to, yes - by definition. And there > are plenty of DACs that do that, according to all evidence.
You keep saying "by definition". By definition of what? Alls DAC which get their timing from the s/pdif signal are susceptible to jitter, and it is easily detected at the analog outputs using a spectrum analyzer. And it it easy to show that different transports can have different jitter content. This does not mean these DACs are not functioning as they're supposed to. If a DAC which implemented word clocking or ASRC were susceptible, then yes I'd agree they're not functioning as specified. But that's a small subset of DACs. Audibility is a separate argument we could have... but your statements about DACs here are wrong. -- seanadams ------------------------------------------------------------------------ seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=45561 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
