Patrick Dixon;288456 Wrote: 
> Actually it is.  When SD changed the SB3 firmware volume control, a
> number of people heard a reduction is sound quality - including me.  We
> weren't aware of what had been done (or even that something had been
> done) and so this was effectively a blind test.

Nearly every time SD changed the firmware lots of people heard the
difference.  Quite remarkable, considering most of the revisions didn't
affect the audio chain.  

> You seem not to appreciate the difference in inaudibility between truly
> random noise, and other low-level distortions - if dithering is applied
> to the rounding process, you should be able to make the noise random,
> and therefore I'd expect it to be inaudible.  However, non-random
> distortions even at very low levels can definitely be audible.

Please provide evidence that anything (-regardless- of its spectrum) at
-140dB is audible at ordinary listening levels.  -Maybe- with your ear
on top of the tweeter, nothing else playing, and the volume cranked you
could hear something.  

> Published measurements do not tell the whole story.

I didn't say they did.

>  As a scientist (assuming you are) you should know that there are very
> few absolutes, and so 'totally immune to jitter' is a meaningless
> phrase anyway.

As the manufacturer and marketer of a SB modification you would say so,
wouldn't you?


-- 
opaqueice
------------------------------------------------------------------------
opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=45561

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to