opaqueice;289078 Wrote: > Well, since I've eliminated acoustics as an explanation, that leaves > psychology. Without data on what you had for breakfast that morning I > can't comment further.
Bad science. You have dismissed the observation that doesn't agree with your theory and stuck to your original paradigm. Very poor. -- Patrick Dixon www.at-tunes.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Patrick Dixon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=90 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=45736 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
