darrenyeats;289143 Wrote: 
> 
> Assuming an audible difference did exist between firmware
> versions...the difference could have been due to a more significant
> miscalculation instead of just a rounding error.

Yes, that's of course true, and I made clear before that I do not - and
cannot - know precisely what changed in some particular firmware
revision.

My guess is Patrick is talking about this "bug" he filed:

http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2557

Although psychoanalysis is hard, you can see (in his comment #2) where
his current confusion probably arises - he's conflating S/N (which
indeed will get worse when you digitally attenuate) with the absolute
level the "N" can ever get to.  It's the latter that matters here.

Patrick Dixon;289145 Wrote: 
> Good thinking, but there's still another explanation I reckon.

You can make all the vague pronouncements you like, but -144db
distortion is not audible, and the errors introduced by attenuating a
24 bit signal are always -144db down from max level.  Therefore they
are not audible, and if you think otherwise, you're wrong.


-- 
opaqueice
------------------------------------------------------------------------
opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=45736

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to