johan73;312206 Wrote: > Can electromagnetic interference (EMI) distort the signal from PC to SB > Receiver? If yes, could this problem be avoided by using cabled > connection to the SB instead of wireless? I'm guessing here, but it's plausible that EMI from the network might affect the SBR's analogue circuitry. However, there's no reason to believe a wireless setup would generate more EMI of the type that might affect an SBR than a wired one. Remember than ethernet cables are typically unshielded, so I'd expect them to generate a fair amount of EMI, and it's anyone's guess at what level and over what RF spectrum.
johan73;312206 Wrote: > Do you recommend substituting the SB's original power supply? With what? Not necessarily. It all depends on whether the EMI that it generates actually affects the particular analogue gear you have. Some people swear that changing to a linear PSU makes a marked improvement, while others say it made no difference. I've speculated before that perhaps it's all down to how vulnerable the other gear is to EMI that is the root cause of this distinction. So if you were to go out and buy a "better" PSU (ie. one that generates less EMI), it might make little or no difference. -- cliveb Transporter -> ATC SCM100A ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=48900 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
