jonheal;326495 Wrote: > I guess the point I was trying to make was that the claim that studio > monitors are more "accurate" to me is now total bee-ess.
In order to support your claim you would have to compare the deviation in sound of your active "studio monitors" with the deviation in sound of the same priced audiophile amplifier + audiophile passive speakers. Can you spot the problem with this? I rather doubt the very cheap speakers you claim to be "studio monitors" would be used as accurate monitors of recorded sound in any commercial studios. Teenagers home bedrooms/studios yes but not "real" studios. If you were to compare the difference in sound of "real" active "studio monitors" against the difference in sound of equivalently priced audiophile amplifier and audiophile passive speakers what would be the outcome? jonheal;326495 Wrote: > If they're ACCURATE, they should all sound alike. I mean the waveform > passing through the voice coils is a measurable, definable thing. That would be true if there was an accurate directivity for loudspeakers. Since there isn't, even loudspeakers with a perfect direct sound are going to sound different in any room with significant indirect sound. -- honestguv ------------------------------------------------------------------------ honestguv's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13734 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=50711 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
