honestguv;327557 Wrote: > In order to support your claim you would have to compare the deviation > in sound of your active "studio monitors" with the deviation in sound > of the same priced audiophile amplifier + audiophile passive speakers. > Can you spot the problem with this? > > I rather doubt the very cheap speakers you claim to be "studio > monitors" would be used as accurate monitors of recorded sound in any > commercial studios. Teenagers home bedrooms/studios yes but not "real" > studios. > > If you were to compare the difference in sound of "real" active "studio > monitors" against the difference in sound of equivalently priced > audiophile amplifier and audiophile passive speakers what would be the > outcome? > > > > That would be true if there was an accurate directivity for > loudspeakers. Since there isn't, even loudspeakers with a perfect > direct sound are going to sound different in any room with significant > indirect sound.
Boy if everything said was true with a speaker, that company would be very well off. Make a speaker that was perfectly flat in response, and that everyone liked. -- Nonreality -IF THE RULE YOU FOLLOWED BROUGHT YOU TO THIS, OF WHAT USE IS THE RULE.- HTTP://www.last.fm/user/nonreality ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nonreality's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15723 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=50711 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
