honestguv;338218 Wrote: > I am curious about these pseudo-scientists and inaccurate facts. Could > you please post an example or two. > > Are pseudo-scientists loonies that are unrelated to scientists?Sure I can :
False fact #1: An amplifier with 0.1% THD @ 1KHz "sounds worse" or "is not as accurate" or whatever else than another amplifier which has 0.005% [EMAIL PROTECTED] Both amplifiers having the same S/N ratio and the same frequency response. False fact #2: A 1$ worth audio cable has no audible coloration in sound. False fact #3: A DAC with 95dB S/N ratio "sounds worse" or "is not as accurate" or whatever else than another DAC having a S/N ratio of 110dB. Frequency response and THD being the same. Pseudo-scientists can be anything : diy-hobbyists, electronic engineers, sellers, hifi critics.. . Not all of people of these categories are such. The problem is that hifi is not a science and (as such) it has no universal rules. The pseudo-scientists simplify truth and are ready to throw to anybody's face their partial -- Themis SB3 - Denon 3808 - Sonus Faber Grand Piano Domus ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Themis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14700 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=45323 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
