Phil Leigh;352422 Wrote: 
> 20kHz sine - looks like a perfect sine

hmmm I had hoped it would not. This is evidence that we're not looking
for a frequency related artifact.

> 21Khz sine - Audacity can't go over 20kHz!!!

double hmmm... we really need a > 22.050 kHz sine in 48 kHz sample rate
to check what happens above 44.1 kHz sample-rate. It might just ditch it
for all I know! The other hmmm is that we find more and more bugs, now
it's audacity!

> 10kHz square - as you predicted - one "valley" in the peak/trough of a
> sine

We really need a photo of this, with detail so put the scope's timebase
so that we get only 1 cycle. We must see if there are any comparable
artifacts in that 1 valley.

> 12kHz square - nice 12kHz sine wave!

Theory agrees with measurement, great! ;-) But this is only the sanity
check for the next one: 12 kHz square at 48 kHz sample rate. It should
then look exactly like the 10 kHz square at 44 kHz sample rate!

cheers,
Nick.


-- 
DeVerm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DeVerm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18104
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53345

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to