CPC;354132 Wrote: > Since you've never tested the TacT RCS 2.2X, this like most of your > statements, "Not to mince words," proves nothing. > > Has Phil Leigh contacted TacT's designer(Boz. [EMAIL PROTECTED]) on > this issue? > > What mode(2.2 or 2.0) is he operating the RCS in? > > What FS is the RCS output set to? > > Does the load impedance perfectly match the cable impedance Phil Leigh > is using? > > Is any of the signal being absorbed, and none of it reflected back to > the source? > > Has he tried Toslink between his SB3 and the TacT RCS? > > BTW- Isn't Phil Leigh the same guy who's post many times on this forum > that: > > "I think I've mentioned before that running the TACT in bypass (flat) > mode sounds identical to unplugging it completely from my > system...YMMV"
I can't answer all of this now but: Toslink vs coax - no difference on the scope tried every FS-OUT - no difference on scope rcs is set to mode 2.0 (no sub is attached) - changing the mode makes no difference except to mono where the signal amplitude increases but stays the same shape. I will email Boz later tonight. -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann JISCO/UPCI - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods)- Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Townsend Supertweeters, Kimber & Chord cables Outdoors: Boombox+Creative Sub (If I remember to turn it on...) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53345 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
