Phil Leigh;354128 Wrote: > SB into DAC (no TACT) = "perfect" squarewave.
Done. It's the TACT. CPC;354132 Wrote: > Since you've never tested the TacT RCS 2.2X, this like most of your > statements, "Not to mince words," proves nothing. I said that *if* the TACT designers hadn't at some point tested it with square-wave digital inputs, they are incompetent. Do you actually disagree with that? And I'm not sure what you thought such a statement was supposed to "prove". I assume you're a frightened TACT owner? > Does the load impedance perfectly match the cable impedance Phil Leigh > is using? If that's the problem it's even worse - that would probably mean the TACT is fundamentally poorly designed (rather than that there's just a bug in the ASRC algorithm which might be fix-able with a software or firmware update). If reacts that badly to the minor levels of jitter introduced by a normal digital coax connection, it's crap (not to mince words). > Has he tried Toslink between his SB3 and the TacT RCS? Apparently so, and no difference - which makes it extremely unlikely this has anything to do with jitter. -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=53345 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
